Individuals who were supervised by the companies had lost homes, jobs, and personal belongings, suffered severe medical problems they had gone without food, clothing, and medicine for themselves and their children to pay for the escalating supervision fees that the companies demanded under threat of arrest and jailing.Īdditionally, the plaintiffs argued that Giles County's process for setting bail violated the Equal Protection and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants violated RICO by acting as an extortionate enterprise focused on creating financial hardship. They also alleged that this created a conflict of interest: purportedly neutral probation officers were financially inclined to impose higher costs on indigent probationers. The companies' supervision of probation payments, according to the plaintiffs, consisted of charging monthly fees' the probationers often could not afford, repeatedly making threats of jail time to induce payment, and humiliating supervision of drug testing. In this role, the defendants allegedly maximized their own profits for the purposes of collecting court debts by adding additional fees and surchages on top of the existing debt owed by probationers. The plaintiffs claimed that CPS and PSI, through their contract with Tennessee Correctional Services, acted as "for profit probation officers" overseeing the collection of fines and other court debts on behalf of Giles County. The case was originally assigned to Chief Judge Waverly D. The plaintiffs, represented by the Civil Rights Corps and private counsel, sought declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs. (PSI), all under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and 42 U.S.C. The plaintiffs sued the Tennessee Correctional Services, and two for-profit probation companies, Community Probation Services (CPS) and Progressive Sentencing, Inc. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. On April 23, 2018, five residents of Tennessee filed this putative class action lawsuit in the U.S. The plaintiffs, represented by the Civil Rights Corps and private counsel, sough… As directed by the probation officer, the defendant shall notify third parties of risks due to the defendant’s criminal record or personal history or characteristics and shall permit the probation officer to make such notifications and to the defendant's compliance with such notification requirement.On April 23, 2018, five residents of Tennessee filed this putative class action lawsuit in the U.S.The defendant shall not enter into any agreement to act as an informer or a special agent of a law enforcement agency without the permission of the court.The defendant shall notify the probation officer within 72 hours of being arrested or questioned by a law enforcement officer.The defendant shall permit a probation officer to visit him or her at any time at home or elsewhere and shall permit confiscation of any contraband observed in plain view of the probation officer.The defendant shall not associate with any persons engaged in criminal activity and shall not associate with any person convicted of a felony, unless granted permission to do so by the probation officer.The defendant shall not frequent places where controlled substances are illegally sold, used, distributed, or administered. The defendant shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol and shall not purchase, possess, use, distribute, or administer any controlled substance or any paraphernalia related to any controlled substance, except as prescribed by a physician.The defendant shall notify the probation officer at least ten days prior to any change in residence or employment.The defendant shall work regularly at a lawful occupation unless excused by the probation officer for schooling, training, or other acceptable reasons.The defendant shall support his or her dependents and meet other family responsibilities.The defendant shall answer truthfully all inquiries by the probation officer and follow the instructions of the probation officer.The defendant shall report to the probation officer in a manner and frequency directed by the court or probation officer.The defendant shall not leave the judicial district without the permission of the court or probation officer.This does not include special conditions the court may impose. These are the standard conditions of supervision or probation the Court must impose.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |